My doctor made a mistake with my treatment. Am I automatically entitled to some compensation?

It is often, understandably, assumed by potential Claimants in medical negligence cases that if they have been unfortunate enough to receive treatment and/or advice from a doctor, nurse or other clinician which was below the standard which one should reasonably expect, then there is always an entitlement to at least some compensation.  This is not, in fact, the case.

For any medical or clinical negligence claim to succeed, the Claimant (who is usually the patient who received the treatment and/or advice in question) will have to prove not only that the medical treatment and/or advice received was inadequate and therefore negligent (this is referred to as “breach of duty”), but also that as a result of this negligence, the Claimant suffered injury which he or she would not otherwise have suffered (this is referred to as “causation”).

If a Claimant is able to show that his or her treating doctor breached the duty of care that the Claimant was owed, but cannot prove that he or she suffered injury as a result then the medical negligence claim will fail.

An example case:

A man, Mr X, falls off his bicycle and is taken by ambulance to the local hospital’s Accident and Emergency department complaining of pain in his left collar bone. An x-ray of the collar bone is carried out and Mr X is informed that the x-ray does not show any fracture. He is given some painkillers and is sent home.

One week later Mr X, who has been at home resting his arm and has not been working, attends his GP surgery as he is still in pain with his collar bone. Whilst there his GP confirms that he has received a copy of the x-ray report from the hospital which confirms that Mr X has sustained a fractured collar bone. The fracture is relatively minor and no surgery is going to be required. Mr X is told that the fracture will heal on its own.

In the above example there is very likely to be a breach of duty on the part of the hospital in that Mr X was incorrectly told that he had not fractured his collar bone whereas in fact he had. However, there is no medical negligence claim because there is no causation. Even if the correct diagnosis of a fractured collar bone had been made at the time, the only treatment would have been painkillers and avoiding strenuous use of the left arm (so as not to make the fracture worse) – both of which have happened in Mr X’ case anyway. In addition, any pain that Mr X suffered in the week between the accident and the diagnosis would have been present anyway.

The above hopefully shows that the often-used quote “Where there’s blame there’s a claim” is not always true.

If you have any comments to make about this article or would generally like to discuss a potential medical negligence claim, then please contact us on 0117 239 8012 and we will put you through to a member of our specialist medical negligence team.

Team members

Bd Medical Negligence
News

Why do medical negligence claims take so long?

July 21, 2017

At the outset of any medical negligence claim, whether against a hospital trust, a private surgeon, a GP or a dentist, the solicitor conducting the case on behalf of the Claimant should provide their ...

Sepsis Logo Final
News

SEPSIS - A delay in diagnosis

August 07, 2018

In England there are around 123,000 cases of sepsis a year with around 37,000 patients sadly passing away as a result of the condition. Source NHS UK. Early treatment has proven to be critical to figh...

arrowarrow-leftburgerLarge M Inc BD Logo - transparentchevroncloseUntitled-2iconmonstr-facebook-6 (1)tick